|  
       Second 
        Meeting of the Inter-Agency  
        Task Force for Disaster Reduction 
        Geneva, 10-11 October 2000 
      
         
          | Major functions 
            of the IATF:  
             The Secretary 
              Generals report on the Successor Arrangements for the International 
              Decade for Natural Disaster (A/54/497), identified the major functions 
              of the Inter-Agency Task Force as follows: 
            
              -  To serve 
                as the main forum within the United Nations system for devising 
                strategies and policies for the reduction of natural hazards;
 
              -  To identify 
                gaps in disaster reduction policies and programmes and recommend 
                remedial action;
 
              -  To ensure 
                complementarity of action by agencies involved in disaster reduction;
 
              -  To provide 
                policy guidance to the secretariat; and,
 
              -  To convene 
                ad hoc meetings of experts on issues related to disaster reduction. 
                
 
             
           | 
         
       
      The Second Meeting 
        of the Inter-Agency Task Force on Disaster Reduction was held in Geneva, 
        10-11 October, 2000, and chaired by Ms. Carolyn McAskie, Deputy to the 
        Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs. Mr. Denis Benn, Director 
        of the ISDR Secretariat a.i., served as Secretary of the meeting. 
      In her opening remarks, 
        Ms. McAskie noted that the first meeting of the Task Force, held in April 
        2000 (see ISDR Informs No. 1), had sent a clear message regarding the 
        approach it felt should be adopted for the implementation of the Strategy. 
        Changes had since been made in the ISDR Secretariat, and in the orientation 
        of its work. She emphasized that there still is a clear need to distinguish 
        between disaster reduction and disaster response. Disaster reduction, 
        the work of ISDR, needs to be viewed within the context of sustainable 
        development. For that reason, even though it reported to the Under-Secretary-General 
        for Humanitarian Affairs, the ISDR Secretariat is distinct and autonomous, 
        and must continue to be so. The Task Force is also unique, in that it 
        represented a rare partnership between United Nations bodies, regional 
        groupings and civil society organizations  all supported by national 
        Governments.  
      The Chair emphasized 
        that it was the role of the Task Force to contribute to the elaboration 
        of the global agenda in disaster prevention, while much of that substantive 
        agenda would be advanced by the Task Force Working Groups. The ISDR Secretariat 
        would be non-operational, but would have to retain the substantive competencies 
        required to carry out the functions assigned to it by ECOSOC, the General 
        Assembly and the Task Force. She noted that the Secretariat had benefited 
        from the secondment by WMO of a senior officer, and asked other Task Force 
        members to consider similar arrangements, so that it could become a truly 
        Inter-Agency Secretariat, as called for in General Assembly resolution 
        54/219. 
      In his opening remarks, 
        the Director of the ISDR Secretariat a.i. stated that, in carrying out 
        its activities, the Secretariat would not duplicate the work of the various 
        United Nations organizations and agencies, but that it would seek to promote 
        multi-sectoral and multi-disciplinary initiatives in the area of disaster 
        reduction which would complement the work of the stakeholders in the ISDR 
        community. He also pledged that the Secretariat would work in close collaboration 
        with members of the Task Force and other relevant actors in seeking to 
        promote the objectives of disaster reduction. He referred to the draft 
        Framework for Action for the Implementation of the International Strategy 
        for Disaster Reduction, which he saw as a living document, 
        not for formal adoption, but for progressive elaboration in consultation 
        with members of the Task Force. Mr. Benn noted that three focus 
        papers, requested by the Task Force at its first meeting, had been 
        prepared by the Secretariat. These dealt with the Application of Science 
        and Technology in Disaster Prevention, Mainstreaming Disaster Reduction 
        in Sustainable Development and National Planning, as well as Capacity 
        Building for Disaster Reduction in Developing Countries. He also referred 
        to two additional papers prepared by the Secretariat, on Policies and 
        Legislation Trends in Disaster Prevention, and on Awareness Raising and 
        Public Information. 
      In introducing the 
        papers later, Mr. Benn pointed to the increased recognition being given 
        to the importance of the application of science and technology to disaster 
        reduction. He also stated that the mainstreaming of disaster reduction 
        in sustainable development and national planning processes was important 
        in order to ensure that greater priority was given to the issue. In addition, 
        he pointed to the critical importance of developing capacity at the individual, 
        institutional and systemic levels to deal with disaster reduction.  
      
         
          |  
             With 
              organizations-  
              membership of IATF  
             
              MEMBERS of the TASK FORCE 
            
              -  Ms. Carolyn 
                McAskie, Chairperson, Deputy to the Under-Secretary-General for 
                Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator a.i.
 
              -  Mr. Denis 
                Benn, Secretary, Director a.i., Secretariat for ISDR
 
             
            UN 
              AGENCIES REPRESENTATIVES 
            
              -  Food and 
                Agriculture Organization (FAO) 
 
              -  United Nations 
                Education, Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO) 
 
              -  International 
                Telecommunications Union (ITU) 
 
              -  World Meteorological 
                Organization (WMO) 
 
              -  United Nations 
                Development Programme (UNDP) 
 
              -  United Nations 
                Environmental Programme (UNEP)
 
              -  World Food 
                Programme (WFP)
 
              -  International 
                Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD)/ World Bank (WB)
 
             
             
              REGIONAL ENTITIES REPRESENTATIVES 
            
              -  Council 
                of Europe 
 
              -  Asian Disaster 
                Preparedness Center (ADPC) 
 
              -  Organization 
                of African Unity (OAU) 
 
              -  OAS/Inter 
                American Committee for Natural Disaster Reduction 
 
              -  South Pacific 
                Applied Geoscience Commission (SOPAC) 
 
              -  CIS Interstate 
                Council 
 
             
             
              CIVIL SOCIETY and NGO REPRESENTATIVES 
            
              -  Director 
                General, International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), 
                
 
              -  Director, 
                Disaster Preparedness Dpt, International Federation of Red Cross 
                and Red Crescent Societies, (IFRC) Geneva, Switzerland
 
              -  Chair, Committee 
                on Disaster Reduction, International Council for Science (ICSU)
 
              -  Director 
                General, International Civil Defense Organizations (ICDO)
 
              -  Drought 
                Monitoring Centre (DMC), Harare, Zimbabwe
 
              -  Munich Reinsurance 
                Company, Munich, Germany
 
              -  Disaster 
                Prevention Bureau, National Land Agency of Japan, Tokyo
 
             
           | 
         
       
       
        Elaboration of a Framework for Action for the Implementation of the 
        International Strategy for Disaster Reduction: 
      The Task Force engaged 
        in a wide-ranging and constructive exchange of views on a draft Framework 
        document, as a reflection of the essential elements of the Strategy, and 
        as a basis for the ongoing elaboration of the Strategy by the Task Force. 
         
      It was suggested that; 
         
      
        -  disaster resilient 
          communities and the reduction of social and economic losses would need 
          to be recast as the over-arching goal of the Strategy, 
 
        -  the link between 
          the activities of the Task Force and the Secretariat and the needs of 
          disaster prone communities would need to be emphasized,
 
        -  regional aspects 
          of disaster reduction and the role of countries and national committees 
          in advancing the Strategy would need to be highlighted.
 
       
      While discussing the 
        Focus papers, there was consensus that the Task Force, the Working Groups 
        and the Secretariat should seek to identify ways in which existing capacities 
        in science and technology could be brought downstream to those who needed 
        them. It was also pointed out that all activities in the field of disaster 
        reduction should include an element of capacity building, which should 
        not be treated separately. 
      It was decided that 
        the next Task Force meeting should take place by April 2001. Overall, 
        the positive approach of the Task Force members and their determination 
        to move forward together to implement the Strategy were noted and appreciated 
        by all, including many of the observers. As a matter of fact, 57 observers 
        among country representatives and organizations assisted the meeting, 
        including many of the countries from the Region of Latin America and the 
        Caribbean and the Ibero-American Association for Civil Protection. 
      The Task Force members 
        were thanked for their constructive suggestions, which, as indicated by 
        the Chair, represented an important contribution to the on-going process 
        of refining the Strategy and the process by which it would be implemented. 
         
      
        
      
         
          |  
             Moving forward
. 
            On substantive 
              issues, Task Force members discussed the work of the three established 
              working groups, new and additional areas of concerns, such as wildfire 
              prevention (a new Working Group to be lead by IUCN was agreed), 
              legislation and disaster reduction, as well as the need for a more 
              defined involvement of countries in the work to achieve the goals 
              of ISDR. 
            The three Working 
              Groups established at the first Task Force meeting (on El Niño, 
              climate change and variability; Early Warning; and Quantification 
              of risk, vulnerability and impact of disasters) presented progress 
              reports on their work. The discussion concluded as follows: 
             
              Working Group 1 
              Disaster reduction activities in the field of El Nino, climate change 
              and variability  
            The representative 
              of WMO, as Chair of Working Group 1, presented a review of work 
              undertaken so far, noting that there was considerable inter-agency 
              work already underway that had been initiated or supported by the 
              Working Groups predecessor, the Inter-Agency Task Force on 
              El Niño. It was noted further that the Inter-agency Committee 
              on Sustainable Development, the UN Framework Convention on Climate 
              Change and the Climate Agenda were additional and ongoing contexts 
              in which Working Group 1 would need to consider its specific contributions 
              to issues related to climate and disasters. 
            It was agreed 
              that the Group would need to identify at an early stage the particular 
              niche or niches on which it would work, such as to formulate plans 
              on ways that information already existing in the scientific and 
              technical community could be made more readily available and useable 
              for national governments and vulnerable communities. 
             
              Working Group 2 
              Early 
              Warning: 
            The representative 
              of UNEP, as Chair of Working Group 2, presented a review of the 
              efforts to establish the Group, which had not yet met.  
            The Task Force 
              affirmed the need for Working Group 2 to develop a relatively narrow 
               and useable  definition of early warning; to make an 
              inventory of early warning activities already undertaken in the 
              United Nations system and, if possible, beyond the United Nations 
              system; and to assess these activities with a view to identifying 
              gaps that need to be filled by further work within the United Nations 
              system and beyond it. There was agreement that the Working Group 
              would also need to identify ways to make early warning tools useful 
              to disaster-prone communities in developing countries.  
             
              Working Group 3 
              Quantification of risk, vulnerability and impact of disasters: 
            The representative 
              of UNDP, as Chair of Working Group 3, presented a review of the 
              work of the Group, which had undertaken preparatory work and had 
              embarked on a substantive programme. 
            It was affirmed 
              that the focus of Working Group 3 should be on the social aspects 
              of quantifying disaster risk, vulnerability and impact, as the World 
              Bank was already engaged in efforts to quantify the economic aspects 
              of these issues. It was suggested that, at the beginning, the Group 
              should concentrate its efforts on major cities at risk, in particular 
              on a number of hot spots. 
             The possibility 
              of developing a World Disaster Vulnerability Report 
              within the context of Working Group 3 was received positively. 
           | 
         
       
      For more information, 
        please contact the  
        ISDR Secretariat:  
        isdr@un.org o pisanof@un.org 
        www.unisdr.org  
       |