Main Page

From HFA-PEDIA

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
(32 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
There have been millions of dollars of timber, jobs, along with other resources riding on figuring out the limits of its variety. As a result, it was imperative to ascertain if there have been 1? species or subspecies to become regarded as for protection beneath the U.S. Endangered Species Act. In two studies (B) making use of 3 markers (mtDNA, microsatellites, and RAPDs), we discovered agreement for 3 subspecies: Northern (S. o. caurina), California (S. o. occidentalis), and Mexican (S. o. lucida) with evidence for subspecies hybridization exactly where taxa met geographically (Haig et al. 2001, 2004a,b). The issue of intraspecific Northern-California Spotted Owl hybrids difficult conservation action plans mainly because the ESA only addresses troubles for hybrids in captive conditions (O'Brien and Mayr 1991). This became a larger concern when we discovered proof that Northern Spotted Owls were hybridizing with Barred Owls (Strix varia) that had been rapidly expanding their variety in to the Pacific Northwest. Not recognizing how in depth this hybridization might be, we created mtDNA, microsatellite, and AFLP markers to differentiate these taxa for use by law enforcement laboratories (Haig et al. 2004a,b; Funk et al. 2006, 2008a). Even immediately after the markers had been developed, there was [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00726 title= fpsyg.2014.00726] a legal conundrum as to the best way to take care of a bird that looked like an ESA-protected Northern Spotted Owl but genetically was a Barred Owl/Northern Spotted Owl hybrid. A little-used clause in the ESA (section four(e)) supplied a potential option (Haig and Allendorf 2006). This `similarity of appearance' clause provides protection for species that are not listed but closely resemble an ESA-listed species. Understanding the genetic status of Northern Spotted Owls was the next important step. We started by taking a landscape genetics strategy (Manel and Holdregger 2013) whereby we could examine the connection among a random distribution Figure three (A) Northern Spotted Owl female and two older chicks of genes having a random distribution of geographic points (photo by Sheila Whitmore), (B) Distribution of sample web pages in the across the range of the Northern Spotted Owl (Funk et al. array of the Northern Spotted Owl (from Funk et al. 2010) (Box 3). 2008b). We didn't uncover substantial breaks in gene flow but we did obtain restrictions in gene flow in options including the Cascade and Coast Variety mountains at the same time as dry river valleys (Fig. 3). A closer investigation into restricted gene flow indicated that Northern Spotted Owls general had probably undergone a [http://brycefoster.com/members/shakebolt9/activity/840631/ http://brycefoster.com/members/shakebolt9/activity/840631/] significant current population bottleneck (Funk et al. 2010). The outcomes were the identical when analyses had been broken down by region (e.g., Cascade Mountains, Olympic peninsula, and so forth.) and local populations. The bottleneck signature was strongest for owls inside the Washington Cascades, an location recognized to become experiencing a significant population decline (Forsman et al. 2011). In actual fact, when we compared our bottleneck outcomes [https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jir.2014.0026 title= jir.2014.0026] for nearby populations with population development rates for the 14 demographic study places monitored over the past 20+ years, there was a robust correlation involving a significant population bottleneck and considerable decline in lambda (population growth price) (Funk et al. 2010). The one exception was a populatio.
+
S) (n = 1, two, 3) transitions with partial widths of 300 - 400 keV [1116]. Recently Belle
 +
S) (n = 1, two, three) transitions with partial widths of 300 - 400 keV [1116]. Recently Belle reported preliminary outcomes around the observation of (5S) (1S, 2S) and (5S) + - (1D) with anomalously significant prices [985]. It's proposed that these anomalies are because of rescatterings [1123,1124]. The big branching fraction from the (4S) (1S) decay observed in 2010 by BaBar could have a similar origin [1125]. The mechanism can be regarded as either as a rescatter??ing on the D D or B B mesons, or as a [http://www.tongji.org/members/shadow2pantry/activity/516070/ http://www.tongji.org/members/shadow2pantry/activity/516070/] contribution of the molecular component towards the quarkonium wave function. ?The model in which Y (4260) is really a D1 (2420) D molecule naturally explains the high probability of the intermediate molecular resonance within the Y (4260) + - J/ transitions [1126,1127] and predicts the Y (4260) X (3872) transitions with high prices [1128]. Such transitions have not too long ago been observed by BES III, with [1107] K + - (2S)2981 Page 74 ofEur. Phys. J. C (2014) 74:[e+ e- X (3872)] 11 . [e+ e- + - J/](4.15)Regardless of striking similarities in between the observations in the charmonium and bottomonium sectors, you'll find also clear variations. In the charmonium sector, every of the Y (3915), (4040), (4160), Y (4260), Y (4360) and Y (4660) decays to only one certain final state with charmonium [ J/, J/, + - J/ or + - (2S)]. Inside the bottomonium sector, there is certainly a single state with anomalous properties, the (5S), and it decays to distinctive channels with comparable prices [ + - (nS), + - h b (m P), + - (1D), (nS)]. There is no common model describing these peculiarities. To explain the affinity from the charmonium-like states to some particular channels, the notion of "hadrocharmonium" was proposed in [1084]. It really is a heavy quarkonium embedded into a cloud of light hadron(s), therefore the fallapart decay is dominant. Hadrocharmonium could also deliver an explanation for [https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jir.2014.0001 title= jir.2014.0001] the charged charmonium-like states Z (4430)+ , Z (4050)+ and Z (4250)+ . four.three.five Summary Quarkonium spectroscopy enjoys an intensive flood of new benefits. The number of spin-singlet bottomonium states has elevated from 1 to 4 more than the final 2 years, including a far more precise measurement of your b (1S) mass, 11 MeV away in the PDG2012 typical. There is evidence for one of the two nonetheless missing narrow charmonium states anticipated ??within the area amongst the D D and D D thresholds. Observations and detailed studies from the charged bottomoniumlike states Z b (10610) and Z b (10650) and initial benefits on the charged charmonium-like states Z c open a rich phenomenological field to study exotic states near open flavor thresholds. There's also considerable progress as well as a extra clear experimental scenario for the highly excited heavy quarkonium states above open flavor thresholds. Current highlights incorporate confirmation in the Y (4140) state by CMS and D0, observation of your decays (4040, 4160) J/ by Belle, measurement on the energy dependence with the e+ e- + - h c cross section by BES III, observation of your Y (4260) X (3872) by BES III and determination on the Z (4430) spin arity from complete amplitude analysis by Belle.

Revision as of 06:04, 3 January 2018

S) (n = 1, two, 3) transitions with partial widths of 300 - 400 keV [1116]. Recently Belle S) (n = 1, two, three) transitions with partial widths of 300 - 400 keV [1116]. Recently Belle reported preliminary outcomes around the observation of (5S) (1S, 2S) and (5S) + - (1D) with anomalously significant prices [985]. It's proposed that these anomalies are because of rescatterings [1123,1124]. The big branching fraction from the (4S) (1S) decay observed in 2010 by BaBar could have a similar origin [1125]. The mechanism can be regarded as either as a rescatter??ing on the D D or B B mesons, or as a http://www.tongji.org/members/shadow2pantry/activity/516070/ contribution of the molecular component towards the quarkonium wave function. ?The model in which Y (4260) is really a D1 (2420) D molecule naturally explains the high probability of the intermediate molecular resonance within the Y (4260) + - J/ transitions [1126,1127] and predicts the Y (4260) X (3872) transitions with high prices [1128]. Such transitions have not too long ago been observed by BES III, with [1107] K + - (2S)2981 Page 74 ofEur. Phys. J. C (2014) 74:[e+ e- X (3872)] 11 . [e+ e- + - J/](4.15)Regardless of striking similarities in between the observations in the charmonium and bottomonium sectors, you'll find also clear variations. In the charmonium sector, every of the Y (3915), (4040), (4160), Y (4260), Y (4360) and Y (4660) decays to only one certain final state with charmonium [ J/, J/, + - J/ or + - (2S)]. Inside the bottomonium sector, there is certainly a single state with anomalous properties, the (5S), and it decays to distinctive channels with comparable prices [ + - (nS), + - h b (m P), + - (1D), (nS)]. There is no common model describing these peculiarities. To explain the affinity from the charmonium-like states to some particular channels, the notion of "hadrocharmonium" was proposed in [1084]. It really is a heavy quarkonium embedded into a cloud of light hadron(s), therefore the fallapart decay is dominant. Hadrocharmonium could also deliver an explanation for title= jir.2014.0001 the charged charmonium-like states Z (4430)+ , Z (4050)+ and Z (4250)+ . four.three.five Summary Quarkonium spectroscopy enjoys an intensive flood of new benefits. The number of spin-singlet bottomonium states has elevated from 1 to 4 more than the final 2 years, including a far more precise measurement of your b (1S) mass, 11 MeV away in the PDG2012 typical. There is evidence for one of the two nonetheless missing narrow charmonium states anticipated ??within the area amongst the D D and D D thresholds. Observations and detailed studies from the charged bottomoniumlike states Z b (10610) and Z b (10650) and initial benefits on the charged charmonium-like states Z c open a rich phenomenological field to study exotic states near open flavor thresholds. There's also considerable progress as well as a extra clear experimental scenario for the highly excited heavy quarkonium states above open flavor thresholds. Current highlights incorporate confirmation in the Y (4140) state by CMS and D0, observation of your decays (4040, 4160) J/ by Belle, measurement on the energy dependence with the e+ e- + - h c cross section by BES III, observation of your Y (4260) X (3872) by BES III and determination on the Z (4430) spin arity from complete amplitude analysis by Belle.

Personal tools