Main Page

From HFA-PEDIA

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
-
Zation conjecture has by now received most acceptance, despite the fact that not yet becoming completely established. four.five.1 Summary of recent experimental progress The previous couple of years have observed incredible progress in measurements of quarkonium production observables, which was mostly, but not solely, due to the operation of the different LHC experiments. Here we'll give an overview on the most remarkable results from the previous years. The production rates of a heavy quarkonium H are split into direct, prompt, and nonprompt contributions. Direct production refers for the production of H directly in the interaction point of your initial particles, whilst prompt production also contains production by way of radiative decays of larger quarkonium states, named [https://www.medchemexpress.com/CUDC-907.html CUDC-907 web] feed-down contributions. Nonprompt production refers to all other production mechanisms, mostly the production of charmonia from decaying B mesons, which is often identified by a second decay vertex displaced in the interaction point. a. J/ production in pp collisions The 2004 CDF transverse momentum pT distribution measurement on the J/ production cross section [1141] is still amongst the most precise heavy quarkonium production measurements. But due to the fact theory errors in all models for heavy quarkonium production are nonetheless substantially bigger than today's experimental errors, it is actually normally not higher precision which can be needed from the theory side, but rather new and much more [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00209 title= fpsyg.2017.00209] diverse production observables. And this can be where the LHC experiments have offered crucial input. As for the J/ hadroproduction cross section, they have extended the CDF measurement [1141] into new kinematic regions: Clearly, the measurements have already been performed at a great deal greater center-of-mass energies than prior to, namely at s = two.76, 7, and 8 TeV. But far more significant for testing quarkonium production models may be the truth that you can find measurements which exceed the previously measured pT variety both at higher pT , as by ATLAS [1142] and CMS [1143], and at low pT , as inside the earlier CMS measurement [1144], but in addition in the recent measurement by the PHENIX collaboration at RHIC [1145]. We note that this list just isn't comprehensive, and that there happen to be several a lot more J/ hadroproduction measurements lately than these cited right here. b. (2S) and c production in pp collisions J/ may be the quarkonium that is easiest to become measured resulting from thelarge branching ratio of its leptonic decay modes, but in current years, high precision measurements happen to be also performed for the (2S), namely by the CDF [1146], the CMS [1143], plus the LHCb [1147] collaborations. Also the c production cross sections were measured through their decays into J/ by LHCb [1148], the very first time since the CDF measurement [1149] in 2001. The c2 to c1 production ratio was measured at LHCb [1150], CMS [1151] and previously by [https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2015.1029593 title= 17470919.2015.1029593] CDF [1152]. These measurements are of terrific importance for the theory side since they allow fits of NRQCD LDMEs for these charmonia and figure out direct J/ production information, which can in turn be when compared with direct production theory predictions. c. production in pp collisions (1S), (2S), and (3S) production cross sections have been measured at the LHC by ATLAS [1153] and LHCb [1154,1155].
+
S) (n = 1, 2, 3) transitions with partial widths of 300 - 400 keV [1116]. Lately Belle
 +
S) (n = 1, 2, three) transitions with partial widths of 300 - 400 keV [1116]. Recently Belle reported preliminary benefits around the observation of (5S) (1S, 2S) and (5S) + - (1D) with anomalously massive prices [985]. It is proposed that these anomalies are as a result of rescatterings [1123,1124]. The substantial branching fraction on the (4S) (1S) decay observed in 2010 by BaBar could possess a similar origin [1125]. The mechanism can be [https://www.medchemexpress.com/CY5-SE.html MedChemExpress Cy5 NHS Ester] regarded either as a rescatter??ing with the D D or B B mesons, or as a contribution from the molecular element for the quarkonium wave function. ?The model in which Y (4260) is usually a D1 (2420) D molecule naturally explains the higher probability in the intermediate molecular resonance within the Y (4260) + - J/ transitions [1126,1127] and predicts the Y (4260) X (3872) transitions with higher prices [1128]. Such transitions have lately been observed by BES III, with [1107] K + - (2S)2981 Page 74 ofEur. Phys. J. C (2014) 74:[e+ e- X (3872)] 11 . [e+ e- + - J/](4.15)Despite striking similarities involving the observations in the charmonium and bottomonium sectors, there are also clear differences. Within the charmonium sector, each and every in the Y (3915), (4040), (4160), Y (4260), Y (4360) and Y (4660) decays to only one particular particular final state with charmonium [ J/, J/, + - J/ or + - (2S)]. In the bottomonium sector, there is certainly 1 state with anomalous properties, the (5S), and it decays to distinct channels with related rates [ + - (nS), + - h b (m P), + - (1D), (nS)]. There's no basic model describing these peculiarities. To clarify the affinity from the charmonium-like states to some certain channels, the notion of "hadrocharmonium" was proposed in [1084]. It is a heavy quarkonium embedded into a cloud of light hadron(s), thus the fallapart decay is dominant. Hadrocharmonium could also give an explanation for [https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jir.2014.0001 title= jir.2014.0001] the charged charmonium-like states Z (4430)+ , Z (4050)+ and Z (4250)+ . four.3.five Summary Quarkonium spectroscopy enjoys an intensive flood of new benefits. The amount of spin-singlet bottomonium states has enhanced from 1 to 4 over the final 2 years, like a a lot more precise measurement of your b (1S) mass, 11 MeV away in the PDG2012 typical. There is certainly proof for one of the two nonetheless missing narrow charmonium states anticipated ??inside the area between the D D and D D thresholds. Observations and detailed studies in the charged bottomoniumlike states Z b (10610) and Z b (10650) and initially benefits around the charged charmonium-like states Z c open a wealthy phenomenological field to study exotic states near open flavor thresholds. There is also significant progress and also a far more clear experimental circumstance for the very excited heavy quarkonium states above open flavor thresholds. Current highlights contain confirmation in the Y (4140) state by CMS and D0, observation on the decays (4040, 4160) J/ by Belle, measurement of your energy dependence in the e+ e- + - h c cross section by BES III, observation with the Y (4260) X (3872) by BES III and determination on the Z (4430) spin arity from complete amplitude analysis by Belle.

Revision as of 04:45, 26 December 2017

S) (n = 1, 2, 3) transitions with partial widths of 300 - 400 keV [1116]. Lately Belle S) (n = 1, 2, three) transitions with partial widths of 300 - 400 keV [1116]. Recently Belle reported preliminary benefits around the observation of (5S) (1S, 2S) and (5S) + - (1D) with anomalously massive prices [985]. It is proposed that these anomalies are as a result of rescatterings [1123,1124]. The substantial branching fraction on the (4S) (1S) decay observed in 2010 by BaBar could possess a similar origin [1125]. The mechanism can be MedChemExpress Cy5 NHS Ester regarded either as a rescatter??ing with the D D or B B mesons, or as a contribution from the molecular element for the quarkonium wave function. ?The model in which Y (4260) is usually a D1 (2420) D molecule naturally explains the higher probability in the intermediate molecular resonance within the Y (4260) + - J/ transitions [1126,1127] and predicts the Y (4260) X (3872) transitions with higher prices [1128]. Such transitions have lately been observed by BES III, with [1107] K + - (2S)2981 Page 74 ofEur. Phys. J. C (2014) 74:[e+ e- X (3872)] 11 . [e+ e- + - J/](4.15)Despite striking similarities involving the observations in the charmonium and bottomonium sectors, there are also clear differences. Within the charmonium sector, each and every in the Y (3915), (4040), (4160), Y (4260), Y (4360) and Y (4660) decays to only one particular particular final state with charmonium [ J/, J/, + - J/ or + - (2S)]. In the bottomonium sector, there is certainly 1 state with anomalous properties, the (5S), and it decays to distinct channels with related rates [ + - (nS), + - h b (m P), + - (1D), (nS)]. There's no basic model describing these peculiarities. To clarify the affinity from the charmonium-like states to some certain channels, the notion of "hadrocharmonium" was proposed in [1084]. It is a heavy quarkonium embedded into a cloud of light hadron(s), thus the fallapart decay is dominant. Hadrocharmonium could also give an explanation for title= jir.2014.0001 the charged charmonium-like states Z (4430)+ , Z (4050)+ and Z (4250)+ . four.3.five Summary Quarkonium spectroscopy enjoys an intensive flood of new benefits. The amount of spin-singlet bottomonium states has enhanced from 1 to 4 over the final 2 years, like a a lot more precise measurement of your b (1S) mass, 11 MeV away in the PDG2012 typical. There is certainly proof for one of the two nonetheless missing narrow charmonium states anticipated ??inside the area between the D D and D D thresholds. Observations and detailed studies in the charged bottomoniumlike states Z b (10610) and Z b (10650) and initially benefits around the charged charmonium-like states Z c open a wealthy phenomenological field to study exotic states near open flavor thresholds. There is also significant progress and also a far more clear experimental circumstance for the very excited heavy quarkonium states above open flavor thresholds. Current highlights contain confirmation in the Y (4140) state by CMS and D0, observation on the decays (4040, 4160) J/ by Belle, measurement of your energy dependence in the e+ e- + - h c cross section by BES III, observation with the Y (4260) X (3872) by BES III and determination on the Z (4430) spin arity from complete amplitude analysis by Belle.

Personal tools