Main Page

From HFA-PEDIA

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
-
Possibly the simplest but most essential molecular analyses required for conservation of your Northern Spotted Owl was to define its taxonomic [http://armor-team.com/activities/p/285512/ http://armor-team.com/activities/p/285512/] status (Fig. three). There were millions of dollars of timber, jobs, and also other sources riding on determining the limits of its range. Thus, it was crucial to identify if there were 1? species or subspecies to be regarded as for protection beneath the U.S. Endangered Species Act. In two research (B) using three markers (mtDNA, microsatellites, and RAPDs), we located agreement for 3 subspecies: Northern (S. o. caurina), California (S. o. occidentalis), and Mexican (S. o. lucida) with evidence for subspecies hybridization where taxa met geographically (Haig et al. 2001, 2004a,b). The problem of intraspecific Northern-California Spotted Owl hybrids difficult conservation action plans mainly because the ESA only addresses difficulties for hybrids in captive scenarios (O'Brien and Mayr 1991). This became a larger concern when we identified proof that Northern Spotted Owls have been hybridizing with Barred Owls (Strix varia) that were speedily expanding their variety in to the Pacific Northwest. Not figuring out how comprehensive this hybridization may be, we developed mtDNA, microsatellite, and AFLP markers to differentiate these taxa for use by law enforcement laboratories (Haig et al. 2004a,b; Funk et al. 2006, 2008a). Even immediately after the markers were developed, there was [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00726 title= fpsyg.2014.00726] a legal conundrum as to ways to handle a bird that looked like an ESA-protected Northern Spotted Owl but genetically was a Barred Owl/Northern Spotted Owl hybrid. A little-used clause in the ESA (section four(e)) offered a prospective solution (Haig and Allendorf 2006). This `similarity of appearance' clause delivers protection for species that happen to be not listed but closely resemble an ESA-listed species. Understanding the genetic status of Northern Spotted Owls was the following critical step. We began by taking a landscape genetics approach (Manel and Holdregger 2013) whereby we could examine the partnership between a random distribution Figure 3 (A) Northern Spotted Owl female and two older chicks of genes with a random distribution of geographic points (photo by Sheila Whitmore), (B) Distribution of sample web sites inside the across the range of the Northern Spotted Owl (Funk et al. array of the Northern Spotted Owl (from Funk et al. 2010) (Box three). 2008b). We didn't find important breaks in gene flow but we did locate restrictions in gene flow in features like the Cascade and Coast Range mountains also as dry river valleys (Fig. three). A closer investigation into restricted gene flow indicated that Northern Spotted Owls all round had probably undergone a substantial recent population bottleneck (Funk et al. 2010). The outcomes have been precisely the same when analyses were broken down by region (e.g., Cascade Mountains, Olympic peninsula, etc.) and local populations. The bottleneck signature was strongest for owls within the Washington Cascades, an location recognized to be experiencing a significant population decline (Forsman et al. 2011). In fact, when we compared our bottleneck results [https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jir.2014.0026 title= jir.2014.0026] for local populations with population development prices for the 14 demographic study regions monitored over the previous 20+ years, there was a robust correlation involving a significant population bottleneck and significant decline in lambda (population development rate) (Funk et al.
+
Probably the simplest but most crucial molecular analyses needed for conservation from the Northern Spotted Owl was to define its taxonomic status (Fig. 3). There had been millions of dollars of timber, jobs, and other sources riding on determining the limits of its range. Thus, it was crucial to decide if there were 1? species or subspecies to be viewed as for protection below the U.S. Endangered Species Act. In two studies (B) using 3 markers (mtDNA, microsatellites, and RAPDs), we discovered agreement for 3 subspecies: Northern (S. o. caurina), California (S. o. occidentalis), and Mexican (S. o. lucida) with evidence for subspecies hybridization where taxa met geographically (Haig et al. 2001, 2004a,b). The challenge of intraspecific Northern-California Spotted Owl hybrids complicated conservation action plans because the ESA only addresses issues for hybrids in captive scenarios (O'Brien and Mayr 1991). This became a bigger concern when we discovered evidence that Northern Spotted Owls had been hybridizing with Barred Owls (Strix varia) that had been immediately expanding their range in to the Pacific Northwest. Not recognizing how comprehensive this hybridization might be, we developed mtDNA, microsatellite, and AFLP markers to differentiate these taxa for use by law enforcement laboratories (Haig et al. 2004a,b; Funk et al. 2006, 2008a). Even right after the markers have been created, there was [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00726 title= fpsyg.2014.00726] a legal conundrum as to how to deal with a bird that looked like an ESA-protected Northern Spotted Owl but genetically was a Barred Owl/Northern Spotted Owl hybrid. A little-used clause in the ESA (section four(e)) provided a possible resolution (Haig and Allendorf 2006). This `similarity of appearance' clause provides protection for species that are not listed but closely resemble an ESA-listed species. Understanding the genetic status of Northern Spotted Owls was the subsequent crucial step. We started by taking a landscape genetics method (Manel and Holdregger 2013) whereby we could examine the partnership amongst a random distribution Figure 3 (A) Northern Spotted Owl female and two older chicks of genes with a random distribution of geographic points (photo by Sheila Whitmore), (B) Distribution of sample web sites inside the across the range of the Northern Spotted Owl (Funk et al. range of the Northern Spotted Owl (from Funk et al. 2010) (Box three). 2008b). We didn't uncover substantial breaks in gene flow but we did obtain restrictions in gene flow in attributes such as the Cascade and Coast Variety [http://kupon123.com/members/witch93laura/activity/134951/ http://kupon123.com/members/witch93laura/activity/134951/] mountains also as dry river valleys (Fig. three). A closer investigation into restricted gene flow indicated that Northern Spotted Owls all round had most likely undergone a considerable current population bottleneck (Funk et al. 2010). The results had been precisely the same when analyses had been broken down by region (e.g., Cascade Mountains, Olympic peninsula, and so forth.) and local populations. The bottleneck signature was strongest for owls in the Washington Cascades, an region known to become experiencing a substantial population decline (Forsman et al. 2011). In reality, when we compared our bottleneck benefits [https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jir.2014.0026 title= jir.2014.0026] for nearby populations with population development prices for the 14 demographic study regions monitored more than the past 20+ years, there was a robust correlation between a important population bottleneck and important decline in lambda (population growth rate) (Funk et al. 2010).

Revision as of 08:45, 8 December 2017

Probably the simplest but most crucial molecular analyses needed for conservation from the Northern Spotted Owl was to define its taxonomic status (Fig. 3). There had been millions of dollars of timber, jobs, and other sources riding on determining the limits of its range. Thus, it was crucial to decide if there were 1? species or subspecies to be viewed as for protection below the U.S. Endangered Species Act. In two studies (B) using 3 markers (mtDNA, microsatellites, and RAPDs), we discovered agreement for 3 subspecies: Northern (S. o. caurina), California (S. o. occidentalis), and Mexican (S. o. lucida) with evidence for subspecies hybridization where taxa met geographically (Haig et al. 2001, 2004a,b). The challenge of intraspecific Northern-California Spotted Owl hybrids complicated conservation action plans because the ESA only addresses issues for hybrids in captive scenarios (O'Brien and Mayr 1991). This became a bigger concern when we discovered evidence that Northern Spotted Owls had been hybridizing with Barred Owls (Strix varia) that had been immediately expanding their range in to the Pacific Northwest. Not recognizing how comprehensive this hybridization might be, we developed mtDNA, microsatellite, and AFLP markers to differentiate these taxa for use by law enforcement laboratories (Haig et al. 2004a,b; Funk et al. 2006, 2008a). Even right after the markers have been created, there was title= fpsyg.2014.00726 a legal conundrum as to how to deal with a bird that looked like an ESA-protected Northern Spotted Owl but genetically was a Barred Owl/Northern Spotted Owl hybrid. A little-used clause in the ESA (section four(e)) provided a possible resolution (Haig and Allendorf 2006). This `similarity of appearance' clause provides protection for species that are not listed but closely resemble an ESA-listed species. Understanding the genetic status of Northern Spotted Owls was the subsequent crucial step. We started by taking a landscape genetics method (Manel and Holdregger 2013) whereby we could examine the partnership amongst a random distribution Figure 3 (A) Northern Spotted Owl female and two older chicks of genes with a random distribution of geographic points (photo by Sheila Whitmore), (B) Distribution of sample web sites inside the across the range of the Northern Spotted Owl (Funk et al. range of the Northern Spotted Owl (from Funk et al. 2010) (Box three). 2008b). We didn't uncover substantial breaks in gene flow but we did obtain restrictions in gene flow in attributes such as the Cascade and Coast Variety http://kupon123.com/members/witch93laura/activity/134951/ mountains also as dry river valleys (Fig. three). A closer investigation into restricted gene flow indicated that Northern Spotted Owls all round had most likely undergone a considerable current population bottleneck (Funk et al. 2010). The results had been precisely the same when analyses had been broken down by region (e.g., Cascade Mountains, Olympic peninsula, and so forth.) and local populations. The bottleneck signature was strongest for owls in the Washington Cascades, an region known to become experiencing a substantial population decline (Forsman et al. 2011). In reality, when we compared our bottleneck benefits title= jir.2014.0026 for nearby populations with population development prices for the 14 demographic study regions monitored more than the past 20+ years, there was a robust correlation between a important population bottleneck and important decline in lambda (population growth rate) (Funk et al. 2010).

Personal tools