Our Benefit Of Dabrafenib

From HFA-PEDIA

Jump to: navigation, search

About 0.1 g of Rhodamine B dye (Sigma Aldrich, Bangaluru, India) was mixed with 500 mL of 2% CHX solution, which is further referred as 2% CHX+R. Viscosity and surface tension of 2% CHX and 2% CHX+R were checked using viscometer (Brookfield HADV-11 +PRO, Middleboro, MA, USA) and goniometer (Digidrop GBX, Bourg de Peage, France), respectively. The 2% CHX+R was used as the final irrigant. All the prepared samples were randomly divided into two groups (n = 10 each) by toss of a binedaline coin. In group 1, conventional syringe irrigation group (control group), irrigation was performed using 30 gauge side vented needle (Max-i-Probe, Dentsply Rinn, Elgin, IL, USA). The tip of the needle was placed 1 mm short of working length and was moved up and down with 2 mm amplitude during irrigation. The irrigant was delivered at a rate of 1 mL/min. A total of 3 mL of 2% CHX+R was used for final irrigation. In group 2, PUI group (experimental group), the root canal was filled with 2% CHX+R, using a 30 gauge side vented needle and then an ultrasonic file (Irri-Safe, Satelec, Acteon Group, Merignac cedex, France) of size 20, 2% taper was inserted in the root canal 1 mm short of the working length. The irrigant was ultrasonically activated for 1 minute at a power setting of 3 with a piezoelectric ultrasonic unit (Suprasson P5 Booster - Satelec).13 This sequence was repeated thrice resulting in a total irrigation time of 3 minutes and a total irrigation volume Dabrafenib cell line of 3 mL. Finally the teeth were cut at 3 mm (apical), 6 mm (middle) and 12 mm (coronal) levels using diamond disc, to obtain dentin sections of 1 mm thickness. Evaluation of penetration depth of 2% CHX+R using CLSM The sections were viewed under CLSM (TCS-SP5, Leica, Mannheim, Germany) to evaluate the depth of penetration of 2% CHX+R. The depth of penetration of 2% CHX+R into root dentinal tubules was depicted by the fluorescence at x10 magnification. An excitation at 543 nm was performed to collect the emission produced in the 560 nm mode. The obtained image was divided into four equal parts and the penetration depth was measured at each part. The average value was recorded as the penetration depth of the sample. The measurement was done using the digital measuring ruler present in Leica microsystems software (LAS-AF, Leica). All the specimens were evaluated by a single operator, who was blinded to the groups. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was performed using Talazoparib solubility dmso Mann-Whitney U test for intergroup analysis. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test were used for intragroup analysis to compare the coronal, middle and apical values. The significance level was set at p

Personal tools